ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2026
Perceived Discrimination Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Head and neck cancer (HNC) accounts for 5% of U.S. cancers, causing ~14,400 deaths annually. Racial minorities and socioeconomically disadvantaged HNC patients experience worse outcomes, presenting at advanced stages and receiving less effective treatment. Even after adjusting for socioeconomic status, insurance, and disease severity, racial and ethnic disparities persist, suggesting additional contributing factors. Perceived discrimination may drive these disparities. This study examines associations between perceived discrimination and demographic, racial, and oncologic factors in HNC patients, hypothesizing associations with race and later-stage diagnoses. Methods: Seventy two HNC patients diagnosed and treated in the past 5 years were recruited. Discrimination was measured using the Discrimination in Medical Settings Scale (DMS), scoring from 7 (no discrimination) to 35 (high discrimination). Patient characteristics and DMS scores were summarized, and associations were analyzed using general linear models. Qualitative insights were collected to guide future research. Results: Most participants were Non-Hispanic White (86.1%), male (68.1%), with an average DMS score of 9.1. Black patients reported lower (nonsignificant) discrimination scores than White patients. Lower-income patients reported significantly higher discrimination scores than high-income patients. No association was found between DMS scores and cancer stage. Qualitative data revealed higher discrimination perceptions among patients with stigmatized histories (e.g., substance use) and lower perceptions among those with limited healthcare exposure. Conclusions: Perceived discrimination in HNC patients is most strongly associated with income, with lower-income patients reporting higher levels of discrimination. Addressing income-related barriers and health-related social needs may help to mitigate perceived discrimination in this population. Level of Evidence: 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.