ArticleACS sustainable chemistry & engineering2026
Sustainable 3D-Printed Supports Coated with Zirconium-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks for Picolinic Herbicide Extraction.
Article in ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) offer outstanding potential for pollutant extraction; however, their practical use is often hindered by difficulties in handling and recovery. Herein, we report a sustainable MOF-based extraction platform that integrates 3D-printed supports fabricated from poly-(lactic acid) and pine wood residues with zirconium-based MOFs grown via a green in situ synthesis. Postprinting surface functionalization enabled the stable immobilization of UiO-66-derived MOFs, selected for their strong affinity toward picolinic herbicides (PHs). The resulting UiO-66-OH@3D-printed device demonstrated high extraction efficiencies (73-107%), excellent sensitivity (limits of detection of 0.0016-0.0032 μg L
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.