Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42099778›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026

Development and validation of a machine learning-based predictive model for new-onset atrial fibrillation after CABG.

JiaLiang Zheng, ZiRu Li, ShaoTing Sun, MingHao Shi, XiaoBing Lu, DaLin Sun, RuoPu Wang, Song He, ChengZhi Niu, CunTao Yu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

JiaLiang ZhengDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
ZiRu LiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
ShaoTing SunDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
MingHao ShiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
XiaoBing LuDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
DaLin SunDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
RuoPu WangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Song HeDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
ChengZhi NiuDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
CunTao YuDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Xin ZhangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is one of the most common post-operative complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and is strongly associated with adverse outcomes. We aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model for predicting NOAF after CABG. Method: We studied 925 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We randomly split the data into a training set (70%) and a validation set (30%). Our primary outcome was new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) after surgery (i.e., the first episode of atrial fibrillation within 7 days post-operatively in patients who were in sinus rhythm before CABG). We developed eight predictive models based on machine learning algorithms and evaluated their performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and the Youden index. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were computed and plotted to interpret the contribution of individual features to model predictions. Results: The incidence of NOAF was 19%. For predicting new-onset atrial fibrillation after CABG, the Gradient Boosting model achieved the highest AUC [0.842 (0.785-0.899)], outperforming the logistic regression model [0.790 (0.722-0.858)]. In addition, AUCs of all machine learning models [0.761-0.842] exceeded those of conventional risk scores, such as CHA2DS2-VASc and HATCH [0.587 (0.55-0.724), 0.62 (0.543-0.697), respectively]. Conclusion: The key features selected by machine learning methods and the resulting predictive models can predict new-onset atrial fibrillation after CABG with reasonable accuracy, which may support exploratory risk stratification and hypothesis generation; external validation is required before clinical implementation.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecoronary artery bypass graftingmachine learningnew-onset atrial fibrillationpredictive modelSHAP value

Identifiers

PMID42099778
PMCPMC13143740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.