Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42099765›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026

Taste alterations in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: an observational study.

Andrea Devecchi, Valentina Casalone, Valentina Ponzo, Dora Tortarolo, Anna Sapino, Simona Bo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea DevecchiUniversity of Gastronomic Sciences of Pollenzo, Pollenzo, Italy.
Valentina CasaloneClinical Nutrition and Dietetics Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
Valentina PonzoDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Dora TortaroloDepartment of Computer Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Anna SapinoPathology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
Simona BoDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Taste alterations are a common adverse effect of chemotherapy and may substantially impair quality of life, social interactions, and dietary habits. Reported incidence rates vary widely, partly due to the heterogeneity of assessment methods. This study aimed to investigate chemotherapy-induced taste alterations in patients with breast cancer using both objective (taste strips) and subjective (questionnaire-based) measures. Materials and methods: This was a prospective study conducted between July 2023 and June 2025 at the Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, in Torino (Italy). Sociodemographic, clinical, anthropometric variables, and dietary habits were collected. Taste alterations were evaluated using both subjective and objective assessment tools (taste strips). Results: A total of 94 female patients were enrolled. Of these, 70 patients had completed chemotherapy and taste evaluation and were included in the statistical analyses. According to subjective assessment, all taste modalities were significantly altered from pre- to post-chemotherapy evaluation, whereas one third of patients exhibited taste impairment when assessed using taste strips. The two methods showed limited agreement. In multiple regression models adjusted for age, smoking status, and pack-years, higher education level was inversely associated with subjective deterioration in sour ( Conclusion: Taste alterations affect a substantial proportion of patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. The low agreement observed between subjective and objective measures suggests that these methods may assess distinct aspects of taste dysfunction and should be interpreted accordingly.

Indexed as

breast cancerchemotherapydysgeusiaobjective methodssubjective methodstastetaste alterations

Identifiers

PMID42099765
PMCPMC13143719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.