ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Enhancing psychological performance and basketball skills: a comparative study of elite athletes and college recreational players after an 8-week mindfulness intervention.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In high-intensity sports such as basketball, psychological factors significantly influence performance. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) show potential for reducing anxiety, depression, and mental fatigue while enhancing attention, resilience, and basketball technical skills. However, few studies have compared the effects of MBI between elite athletes and recreational players. Purpose: This research examined the effects of an 8-week Mindfulness Acceptance Insight Commitment (MAIC) intervention on psychological performance and technical skills among elite basketball athletes and collegiate recreational players, while investigating skill level as a moderator. Methods: Sixty seven participants (24 elite athletes, 43 recreational players) were randomly assigned to experimental or control groups. The MAIC program consisted of two 60-min sessions per week. Psychological measures included the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Schultz Attention Test (SAT), and Conner-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Basketball skill assessments comprised the Speed and Accurate Shooting Test, Obstacle Dribbling Test, Defensive Sliding Test, Lay-up Test, and No-Ball Maneuver Running. Assessments were conducted pre- and post-intervention. Results: Sixty three participants completed the study. Elite athletes showed significant improvements in STAI, CD-RISC, and Obstacle dribbling test performance post-MAIC, with a trend toward benefit in the SAT. Recreational players demonstrated broader benefits, including improvements in Speed and Accurate Shooting Test, Lay-up Test, STAI, SAT, and CD-RISC. ANOVA revealed that, controlling for baseline measures, recreational basketball players demonstrated greater benefits than elite athletes in shooting, dribbling, anxiety, and depression, indicating a skill-level moderating effect. Conclusion: MAIC enhances psychological and technical performance differentially: elite athletes primarily benefit in targeted psychological domains, while recreational players experience more comprehensive psychological and skill-related effects. These findings support personalized mindfulness interventions in basketball, enriching sports psychology theory and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.