Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42099736›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

When resources run short: the inhibitory effect of economic scarcity on third-party punishment.

Hanyu Liang, Jie Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hanyu LiangDepartment of Psychology, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot, China.
Jie LiDepartment of Psychology, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates how economic scarcity influences third-party punishment, a costly and non-self-interested behavior that plays a critical role in maintaining social norms and cooperation. In real-world contexts, individuals often operate under resource constraints that may systematically alter their cost-benefit calculations; however, it remains unclear whether and how scarcity affects the willingness to punish unfairness. Across two experiments, we examined whether scarcity reduces individuals' propensity to engage in third-party punishment. Experiment 1, involving 70 participants, showed that individuals under scarcity allocated significantly fewer resources to sanction unfair dictators than those in a control condition. Experiment 2, with 41 participants, replicated this design across two time points separated by 2 months. The results further confirmed the suppressing effect of scarcity on punishment and demonstrated a similar pattern of results across time points. These findings offer important theoretical and practical implications for promoting cooperation and effective norm enforcement under resource-limited conditions.

Indexed as

college studentseconomic scarcityexperimental studylongitudinal studythird-party punishment

Identifiers

PMID42099736
PMCPMC13144109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.