ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Neural responses to proxemic distance regulation in urban public spaces in the post-COVID context using a portable electroencephalogram.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in cognitive neuroscience are increasingly informing architectural and urban studies by providing objective insights into human-environment interactions. Proxemic relationships play a critical role in shaping urban spaces, and the widespread implementation of social distancing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic may have influenced how individuals perceive and regulate interpersonal distance. This exploratory study investigates neural responses associated with proxemic distances in urban settings during the post-COVID period, referencing established proxemic frameworks rather than relying on direct pre-pandemic neural comparisons. Using a quasi-experimental design, primary data were collected through portable electroencephalography (EEG) recordings and questionnaires. Participants were exposed to controlled interpersonal distance scenarios in an outdoor urban environment, allowing examination of neural activity at personal and social distances. EEG analyses focused on alpha (8-12 Hz) and low-beta (12-15 Hz) frequency bands, which are commonly associated with relaxation and attentional engagement, respectively. Results indicate a consistent decrease in alpha power and a concurrent increase in low-beta activity when interpersonal distance was reduced, suggesting heightened vigilance and cognitive engagement in response to proxemic intrusion. Behaviorally, a subset of participants maintained interpersonal distances exceeding classical proxemic norms, highlighting variability in post-COVID distancing tendencies. These findings suggest deviations from established proxemic standards that warrant further investigation. The findings offer preliminary neurophysiological evidence relevant to urban and architectural design, emphasizing the importance of considering interpersonal distance as a factor influencing mental comfort in public spaces. Future research employing longitudinal designs, larger samples, and complementary qualitative measures is needed to clarify the persistence and origins of observed proxemic adaptations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.