ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Cultural fiction as predictive-affective simulation: a neurocognitive model of male emotional regulation and gender violence prevention.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This conceptual article develops an integrative framework connecting the Tie-Up Theory of affective receptivity with predictive processing models of brain function, in order to advance a neurocognitive understanding of the emotional mechanisms underlying gender-based violence and its prevention. Departing from the observation that feminicide cannot be explained solely through sociological or ideological variables, the paper focuses on its emotional and predictive precursors, particularly the inability to tolerate frustration, rejection, or loss without attempting to restore control. Drawing on research in psychology, cognitive neuroscience, cultural studies, and gender theory, we argue that cultural fictionality (as encountered in theatre, cinema, and literature) can function as a predictive-affective simulator. In this model, Predictive Processing provides the mechanistic account of how emotional states arise through prediction errors and their regulation, while the Tie-Up Theory specifies the affective content that these mechanisms operate upon, describing how the male Receptive Area responds to narrative interiority, vulnerability, and relational complexity. A key contribution of this paper is the identification of a specific intervention window within the documented escalation phases that precede feminicide: the transition between emotional dysregulation (rumination, anger, shame) and maladaptive coping (externalization, aggression). We argue that engagement with cultural fiction may modulate this transition by strengthening emotional flexibility and tolerability of negative affect before it crystallizes into violent scripts. Through symbolic exposure to disappointment, ambiguity, and emotional dissonance, cultural fictions allow individuals to rehearse adaptive regulation within safe aesthetic frames, counteracting the rigid control-oriented schemas that sustain patriarchal violence. Although the model is theoretical, it offers a generative basis for future empirical research in experimental psychology, audience studies, and neurocognitive measurement to assess the potential of cultural fiction as an affective regulatory intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.