ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Untapped potential: graduate students as catalysts in scientific discovery.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is no universal blueprint for assembling scientific teams or co-creating knowledge. Yet, one critical and often minimized component in team research is the role of graduate students. Although funding agencies increasingly require the inclusion of graduate students as project personnel, little is done post-award to evaluate or support their integration into a team's knowledge network. This neglect risks reducing graduate students to a transactional means of accomplishing project objectives rather than ensuring their genuine inclusion as knowledge contributors. This perspective article argues that graduate students are a missing or overlooked catalyst in scientific discovery teams. Using illustrative field cases and social network diagrams, we demonstrate the transformative impact of meaningfully integrating students and the high cost of their exclusion. Our preliminary observations suggest that graduate students can and do generate new knowledge, fulfill a multitude of roles on teams, and shape collaborative practices in distinctive ways through their influence in the network and the diverse perspectives and backgrounds that they bring to research teams. The article concludes with a roadmap to promote future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.