Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42099709›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Untapped potential: graduate students as catalysts in scientific discovery.

Hannah B Love, Ellen R Fisher, Bethany K Laursen, Ellyn M Dickmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hannah B LoveDivergent Science LLC, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Ellen R FisherDivergent Science LLC, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Bethany K LaursenMichigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Ellyn M DickmannDickmann and Associates LLC, Loveland, CO, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no universal blueprint for assembling scientific teams or co-creating knowledge. Yet, one critical and often minimized component in team research is the role of graduate students. Although funding agencies increasingly require the inclusion of graduate students as project personnel, little is done post-award to evaluate or support their integration into a team's knowledge network. This neglect risks reducing graduate students to a transactional means of accomplishing project objectives rather than ensuring their genuine inclusion as knowledge contributors. This perspective article argues that graduate students are a missing or overlooked catalyst in scientific discovery teams. Using illustrative field cases and social network diagrams, we demonstrate the transformative impact of meaningfully integrating students and the high cost of their exclusion. Our preliminary observations suggest that graduate students can and do generate new knowledge, fulfill a multitude of roles on teams, and shape collaborative practices in distinctive ways through their influence in the network and the diverse perspectives and backgrounds that they bring to research teams. The article concludes with a roadmap to promote future research.

Indexed as

Archintor™graduate studentnetwork analysisresearch teamsscience of team sciencescientific teamssocial network analysisteam science

Identifiers

PMID42099709
PMCPMC13143669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.