Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42099707›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

The use of artificial intelligence based modelling techniques in One Health-related infectious disease studies in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review.

Bruno Enagnon Lokonon, Sèton Calmette Ariane Houetohossou, Bruno Amèdjiko Tchede, Richard B Yapi, Aurélie Cailleau, Daniel T Haydon, Bassirou Bonfoh

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bruno Enagnon LokononCentre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d'Ivoire (CSRS), Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Sèton Calmette Ariane HouetohossouLaboratoire de Biomathématiques et d'Estimations Forestières, Université d'Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Benin.
Bruno Amèdjiko TchedeLaboratoire de Biomathématiques et d'Estimations Forestières, Université d'Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Benin.
Richard B YapiCentre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d'Ivoire (CSRS), Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Aurélie CailleauCentre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d'Ivoire (CSRS), Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Daniel T HaydonSchool of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Bassirou BonfohCentre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d'Ivoire (CSRS), Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sub-Saharan Africa continues to face a substantial burden of infectious diseases, many of which are zoonotic and shaped by complex interactions across human, animal, and environmental systems. Artificial Intelligence (AI), encompassing machine learning (ML) and deep-learning (DL) techniques, has emerged as a powerful tool for enhancing disease prediction, surveillance, diagnosis, and decision-making within a One Health (OH) framework. Method: This systematic review synthesizes evidence from 62 peer-reviewed studies to assess how AI-based modelling techniques have been applied to infectious disease research across Sub-Saharan Africa. Results: Results show that AI adoption has grown rapidly since 2019, with a pronounced surge in publications between 2021 and 2024. However, research leadership and implementation capacity remain geographically uneven, with South Africa, Ethiopia, Kenya, and Tanzania dominating the landscape. Across studies, AI tools were used primarily for classification and prediction tasks, with ensemble models and deep-learning architectures showing the strongest performance (with median accuracy close to 100% for Convolutional Neural Network model). Malaria (24%), HIV (12%), COVID-19 (12%), and Tuberculosis (6.7%) were the most frequently targeted diseases, while zoonotic and environmentally linked infections were comparatively underrepresented. Most studies relied exclusively on human data, revealing a persistent gap in the integration of animal and environmental components critical to the OH paradigm. Conclusion: Despite promising applications, including image-based parasite detection, IoT-enabled surveillance, ecological risk modelling, and smartphone-assisted diagnostics, AI deployment remains constrained by limited computational infrastructure, inadequate digital connectivity, data-governance weaknesses, and shortages of AI-trained specialists. Conversely, expanding mobile connectivity, cloud-based analytics, and advancements in multilingual AI tools could create new opportunities to strengthen surveillance systems, empower health workers, and improve community engagement.

Indexed as

Africaevidence synthesishuman–animal–environment interfacesintegrated disease surveillancemachine learning applications

Identifiers

PMID42099707
PMCPMC13144102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.