ArticleBrain & spine2026
Minimally invasive tubular resection of spinal arachnoid webs.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Spinal arachnoid webs (SAWs) are rare intradural extramedullary lesions causing progressive myelopathy. For surgical resection, minimally invasive approaches, especially using tubular retractors, remain underreported. Research question: This study presents a series of minimally invasive SAW resections performed through expandable and non-expandable tubular retractors. Material and methods: This retrospective monocentric cohort study included patients with minimally invasive tubular resection of SAWs between July 2017 and December 2025. Preoperative and postoperative status was assessed using the modified McCormick grading scale, surgical details were descriptively analyzed. Results: The cohort comprised 5 male and 7 female patients (mean age 61.1 ± 8.8 years). All patients presented with progressive myelopathy. All lesions were located in the upper thoracic spine, with T2-3 being most common. All patients demonstrated the pathognomonic scalpel sign on preoperative MRI, two patients (17%) had associated syringomyelia. Surgical technique involved expandable (3/12) and non-expandable tubular retractors (20 mm diameter, 9/12). Mean operative time was 110 ± 30 min with minimal blood loss in all cases. Two patients required revision surgery. No permanent neurological deficits occurred, and all patients maintained stable or improved neurological function postoperatively. Discussion and conclusion: This series represents the largest experience with tubular resection of SAWs using non-expandable retractor systems with 20 mm diameter access corridors. The revision rate aligns with the published literature and reflects the technical challenges rather than a limitation of the approach. This truly minimally invasive approach is safe and effective in appropriately selected patients and in experienced centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.