ArticleF1000Research2026
Mentor's Perspective on Structured Clinical Mentoring in the Arab Context.
Article in F1000Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Mentorship in Nursing Practice in the UAE: A Mixed-Methods Study of Mentor Perspectives on Effectiveness, Training, and Support.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Peer-Tutoring as a Student-Centered pedagogy in Nursing research Education: Effects on Knowledge Acquisition and Academic Self-Confidence.F1000Research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mentorship is essential in nursing education to foster clinical skills, critical thinking, and professional identity. Despite extensive research on mentorship, few studies have addressed its role in the Arab cultural context. This study explored nursing mentors' clinical learning experiences through mentorship within the cultural context of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Methods: A qualitative approach was employed, involving 20 mentors supervising fourth-year nursing students during their final clinical placement at a semi-public university in the UAE. The placement occurred from January to May 2024, as part of the Consolidation of Practice course, comprising 240 hours of clinical training. Structured and semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with the participants, and the data were transcribed verbatim. To analyse the data, an inductive thematic approach was adopted, and some data were quantified for additional insights. Results: Four main themes emerged regarding the benefits of structured mentoring within the cultural context: critical for practical training, confidence building, bridging theory and practice and mutual learning. The essential mentoring skills identified were effective communication, patience, and understanding. Structured mentoring frequency positively influenced students' clinical learning. The strengths of the structured mentorship included exposure to real-life scenarios, improved communication, and the development of practical skills. Opportunities for improvement included increasing mentor-student interactions, enhancing the programme's structured nature, and integrating technological tools. The mentors recommended reassessing mentorship duration, increasing hands-on clinical exposure, strengthening mentor collaboration, and promoting student accountability. Conclusion: Effective mentorship in nursing education in the UAE requires integrating theory and practice, clear communication, and leveraging technology to overcome barriers. Strengthening structured mentor-student interactions through focused workshops and refined programme structures can bridge educational gaps. Such enhancements can enable nursing students to develop into competent and confident healthcare professionals, who are familiar with culturally informed mentorship practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.