Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42099669›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2026

Predictors of emotional well-being in university professors using Machine Learning.

Rufina Narcisa Bravo-Alvarado, Juan Francisco Peraza-Garzón, Narcisa Isabel Cordero-Alvarado, Isabel Dafne Dalila Márquez-Galarza, Raúl Alberto Rengifo-Lozano, Ángel Ramón Sabando-García, Cisaddy Samantha Lazo-Bravo, Jimmy Manuel Zambrano-Acosta, Jenniffer Sobeida Moreira-Choez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rufina Narcisa Bravo-AlvaradoFacultad de Posgrado, Universidad Estatal de Milagro, Milagro, Guayas, 091050, Ecuador.
Juan Francisco Peraza-GarzónFacultad de Informática Mazatlán, Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa, Culiacán, Sinaloa, 80000, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3228-7037
Narcisa Isabel Cordero-AlvaradoUniversidad Estatal de Milagro, Milagro, Guayas, 091050, Ecuador.
Isabel Dafne Dalila Márquez-GalarzaMinisterio de Educación (MINEDU) del Perú, Lima, Perú, 15021, Peru.
Raúl Alberto Rengifo-LozanoUniversidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima District, Lima Region, 15081, Peru.
Ángel Ramón Sabando-GarcíaDepartamento de Matemáticas y Estadística, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador- Sede Santo Domingo, Santo Domingo, Santo Domingo, 230207, Ecuador.
Cisaddy Samantha Lazo-BravoUniversidad Estatal de Milagro, Milagro, Guayas, 091050, Ecuador.
Jimmy Manuel Zambrano-AcostaFacultad de Posgrado, Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Portoviejo, Manabí, 130105, Ecuador.
Jenniffer Sobeida Moreira-ChoezFacultad de Posgrado, Universidad Estatal de Milagro, Milagro, Guayas, 091050, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8604-3295

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the current context of increasing psycho-emotional strain within higher education, the emotional well-being of university faculty has become a strategic variable for institutional management. In response to this challenge, the present study aimed to predict emotional well-being among faculty members from the State University of Milagro and the Technical University of Manabí through the application of machine learning algorithms. Methodology: A quantitative, explanatory, and correlational-predictive design was adopted, using a stratified probabilistic sample of 1,470 university professors. Data were collected through a psychometrically validated questionnaire and analyzed using supervised learning models implemented in Orange Data Mining. Results: The findings revealed that Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, and Neural Network algorithms achieved the highest predictive performance, reaching optimal levels of accuracy, sensitivity, and calibration. The most significant predictors identified were emotional regulation, social competencies, emotional autonomy, and emotional awareness, whereas life and well-being competencies did not show a positive relationship. Additionally, age and level of academic training were associated with higher levels of emotional well-being. Conclusion: The results highlight the capacity of machine learning algorithms to predict faculty emotional well-being with high accuracy and underscore their usefulness as decision-support tools for institutional management in occupational mental health.

Indexed as

EmotionsFacultyMachine LearningBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsFemaleHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPsychological Well-BeingRandom ForestUniversitiesartificial intelligenceemotional regulationemotional well-beingmachine learningpredictionpredictive models.socio-emotional competenciesuniversity faculty

Identifiers

PMID42099669
PMCPMC13146459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.