ArticleF1000Research2026
Predictors of emotional well-being in university professors using Machine Learning.
Article in F1000Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictors of emotional well-being in university professors using Machine Learning.F1000Research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the current context of increasing psycho-emotional strain within higher education, the emotional well-being of university faculty has become a strategic variable for institutional management. In response to this challenge, the present study aimed to predict emotional well-being among faculty members from the State University of Milagro and the Technical University of Manabí through the application of machine learning algorithms. Methodology: A quantitative, explanatory, and correlational-predictive design was adopted, using a stratified probabilistic sample of 1,470 university professors. Data were collected through a psychometrically validated questionnaire and analyzed using supervised learning models implemented in Orange Data Mining. Results: The findings revealed that Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, and Neural Network algorithms achieved the highest predictive performance, reaching optimal levels of accuracy, sensitivity, and calibration. The most significant predictors identified were emotional regulation, social competencies, emotional autonomy, and emotional awareness, whereas life and well-being competencies did not show a positive relationship. Additionally, age and level of academic training were associated with higher levels of emotional well-being. Conclusion: The results highlight the capacity of machine learning algorithms to predict faculty emotional well-being with high accuracy and underscore their usefulness as decision-support tools for institutional management in occupational mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.