ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Predicting coronary artery lesions in patients with Kawasaki disease in China using a machine-learning algorithm: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to analyze the risk factors of coronary artery lesions (CAL) in patients with Kawasaki disease (KD) and establish predictive models for CAL in patients with KD. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included KD patients admitted to Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, collecting data on 41 demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters. LASSO regression identified key predictive variables. The dataset was split into 70% training and 30% validation. Ten models were trained using 10-fold cross-validation, with the training set balanced through ROSE oversampling. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Results: The CatBoost algorithm achieved the best results: AUC, 0.953; sensitivity, 0.908; specificity, 0.860; and accuracy, 0.883. Internal validation results were as follows: AUC, 0.874; sensitivity, 0.721; specificity, 0.848; accuracy, 0.837. External validation results were as follows: AUC, 0.876.sensitivity, 0.894; specificity, 0.954. Conclusions: We present a machine-learning model that predicts the risk of CAL in patients with KD in China, aiding doctors in creating personalized treatment strategies to improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.