Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42099583›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2026

A data-analytics framework for exploring regression associations in multivariate categorical data of firefighters' PTSD.

Saebom Jeon, Daeyoung Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Saebom JeonDepartment of Marketing Bigdata, Mokwon University, Daejeon, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2771-675X
Daeyoung KimDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2223-2166

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose a data-analytics framework for exploratory research that aims for a comprehensive understanding of potential associations in the survey data regarding firefighters' PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder). The primary focus is to obtain insights regarding joint, marginal and conditional regression associations between an ordinal response variable, firefighters' PTSD, and a set of categorical risk factors in a comprehensive and integrated manner. To achieve this goal, the proposed framework incorporates two established data-driven methodologies: the recently developed non-model based regression association measure named as SCCRAM (Scaled Checkerboard Copula Regression Association Measure) and resampling (bootstrap/permutation) methods. The former facilitates the identification of subsets of risk factors that more effectively account for the overall regression association with PTSD, while also elucidating the roles of the relevant risk factors in both marginal and conditional aspects. The latter provides valuable information pertaining to uncertainties and statistical significances, as well as potential biases and the credibility of the estimated regression associations in multi-dimensional contingency tables which are often subject to sparseness or imbalance. Utilizing the proposed approach, our empirical findings indicate that disorder/mental health related factors have a more substantial association with PTSD, and the relationship between demographic/job-related factors and PTSD becomes more pronounced when accounting for the disorder/mental health factors.

Indexed as

62H0562H1762H20Multidimensional contingency tablesordinal categorical variablesPTSDregression associationsresampling methods

Identifiers

PMID42099583
PMCPMC13148093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.