ArticleHealth services & outcomes research methodology2026
Estimating an intervention's effects on health care disparities within and between physician organizations: decomposing the effects of health system affiliation.
Article in Health services & outcomes research methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health System Affiliation and Care for Dual-Eligible and Non-Dual-Eligible Medicare Beneficiaries.JAMA network open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vertically integrated health systems are expanding across the U.S., but there is no evidence that system-affiliated providers are better able to reduce socioeconomic disparities than unaffiliated providers. This paper develops and interprets statistical models for estimating the longitudinal effects of an exposure, health system affiliation, on within- and between-group disparities. Mixed effect difference-in-differences regression models were used to estimate the effect of physician organization (PO) health system affiliation on socioeconomic disparities in diabetes medication adherence for fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries from 2013 to 2019, decomposing the effect of affiliation on disparities into within- and between-PO socioeconomic disparities. We find that after becoming affiliated, adherence for dually-eligible beneficiaries worsened relative to non dually-eligible beneficiaries within POs, but between-PO disparities were reduced. Simulation studies were used to evaluate the methods, and showed the importance of centering dual-eligibility status and its interaction with affiliation status at the PO-year level and including the PO-year level means as predictors to decompose effects of affiliation into within and between-PO effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.