ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2026
Coronary artery anomalies: contemporary approaches to risk stratification and management.
Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The widespread adoption of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has led to a growing detection of coronary artery anomalies in contemporary clinical practice, often as incidental findings during the evaluation of suspected or known coronary artery disease. Among these, anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) represents the most clinically debated entity, historically associated with myocardial ischaemia and sudden cardiac death, yet increasingly identified in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic adults. Accumulating evidence indicates that most AAOCA diagnosed in adulthood are not associated with functionally relevant ischaemia and frequently follow a benign clinical course, highlighting the limitations of anatomy-based risk stratification alone. In this context, CCTA plays a pivotal role by accurately defining coronary origin and course, characterizing proximal vessel morphology, and assessing concomitant atherosclerotic disease, which often represents the predominant determinant of symptoms and prognosis in adult patients. Recent studies have demonstrated that quantitative CCTA-derived parameters can reliably exclude hemodynamically significant AAOCA and reduce unnecessary downstream testing. In selected cases, invasive functional assessment and intracoronary imaging provide incremental value by clarifying the presence and mechanisms of ischaemia but should be reserved for carefully selected patients. This review summarizes current evidence on coronary artery anomalies with a specific focus on AAOCA and proposes a pragmatic, stepwise approach integrating anatomical and functional assessment to guide clinical decision-making in daily practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.