ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2026
Role of transcatheter ablation in ischaemic ventricular tachycardia: should we be using it more?
Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischaemic ventricular tachycardia (VT) represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with ischaemic heart disease. Transcatheter ablation has emerged as a complementary therapeutic strategy to implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and antiarrhythmic drug therapy. The efficacy, safety, optimal timing, and cost-effectiveness of catheter ablation justify its current role in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy who undergo device-based interventions. Randomized clinical trials, including VANISH, VANISH2, and PARTITA, have demonstrated that early ablation significantly reduces VT recurrence and ICD shocks compared with antiarrhythmic drug therapy alone. First-line ablation in patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function (LVEF >35%) is associated with excellent long-term outcomes and low rates of sudden cardiac death. Recent advances in functional substrate mapping techniques have further improved procedural outcomes. Periprocedural mortality remains low (0.4-5%) and is mainly attributable to early VT recurrence rather than procedural complications. Current evidence supports a broader use of catheter ablation in ischaemic VT, which has historically been confined to high-volume centres, and particularly suggests its adoption as an early or first-line strategy in selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.