ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2026
Use of vericiguat in the VICTOR trial: a study that is difficult to interpret.
Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vericiguat is a soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator that acts by restoring the nitric oxide-cyclic guanosine monophosphate pathway, which is markedly impaired in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The VICTORIA trial demonstrated that treatment with vericiguat leads to a significant reduction in mortality and morbidity in patients with HFrEF and a recent episode of clinical decompensation. However, the role of vericiguat in clinically stable patients had remained unexplored until the recent publication of the VICTOR trial. In a population receiving optimal medical therapy and characterized by a lower risk of events, vericiguat did not demonstrate a significant reduction in the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure. When analysing the individual components of the primary endpoint, no benefit was observed with respect to hospitalizations, whereas significant reductions in both cardiovascular and all-cause mortality were reported. This finding, which is highly unusual in the context of recent clinical trials in patients with HFrEF, warrants further consideration when interpreting the results of the study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.