Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42099473›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2026

The comeback of digitalis (digitoxin): the DIGIT-HF trial.

Edoardo Sciatti, Emilia D'Elia, Mauro Gori, Luca Fazzini, Salvatore D'Isa, Luca Antonio Felice Di Odoardo, Ottavio Zucchetti, Attilio Iacovoni, Michele Senni, Antonello Gavazzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Edoardo SciattiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
Emilia D'EliaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
Mauro GoriDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5509-8867
Luca FazziniDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
Salvatore D'IsaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
Luca Antonio Felice Di OdoardoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
Ottavio ZucchettiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
Attilio IacovoniDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0347-6672
Michele SenniDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5502-7882
Antonello GavazziFROM Foundation for Research, Ospedale di Bergamo E.T.S., Bergamo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac glycosides represent one of the oldest therapeutic pillars in medicine, although their role has progressively diminished in the modern era of neurohormonal therapy for heart failure (HF). Following publication of the Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG) trial in 1997, no randomized clinical trials evaluating this drug class were conducted for almost three decades, while observational studies and meta-analyses accumulated, often yielding conflicting results. The DIGIT-HF randomized clinical trial (2025) addressed a major unmet need by evaluating digitoxin in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction in the contemporary era of guideline-directed medical therapy. Treatment with digitoxin was associated with favourable outcomes, including a reduction in the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and hospitalizations for HF, thereby reopening a long-standing debate on the role of digitalis, which had remained marginal for many years. This article reviews the history of digitalis, the main evidence generated over recent decades, the evolution of clinical guidelines from 1997 to 2022, and the conceptual and clinical implications of the DIGIT-HF trial.

Indexed as

DigitalisDIGIT-HFDigitoxinDigoxinDIG trialHeart failure

Identifiers

PMID42099473
PMCPMC13147277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.