ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2026
Discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy after atrial fibrillation ablation: the ALONE-AF and OCEAN studies.
Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two randomized trials, the ALONE-AF and OCEAN, have provided valuable evidence to guide the management of oral anticoagulation therapy after ablation of atrial fibrillation. In the ALONE-AF study, amongst patients with no documented atrial fibrillation recurrence at 1 year after transcatheter ablation, the 2-year incidence of the composite endpoint of stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding was significantly lower in those who discontinued oral anticoagulation compared with those who continued therapy. This difference was driven by a reduction in major bleeding events, with similar rates of stroke between groups. In the OCEAN study, amongst patients without atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence during the year following transcatheter ablation, rivaroxaban 15 mg, compared with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), did not significantly reduce the 3-year incidence of stroke, systemic embolism, or new silent embolic cerebral infarction, but was associated with an increased risk of clinically relevant non-major bleeding. The annualized incidence of thromboembolic events was low (0.3-0.6 events per 100 patient-years). Taken together, data from these two trials suggest that discontinuation of oral anticoagulation (OAC) may be a clinically reasonable option in patients without AF recurrence for at least 1 year after ablation. This strategy should be limited to patients at low thromboembolic risk, comparable to those enrolled in the two trials. Furthermore, the implementation of optimal and sustainable rhythmmonitoring strategies is essential to support decisions regarding OAC discontinuation after AF ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.