ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2026
Navigating guidelines and realities: informed free choice in infant feeding for people living with HIV.
Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unlearning prohibition: the de-implementation of HIV breastfeeding restrictions in the United States.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent shifts in U.S. and global HIV perinatal guidelines have reopened long-constrained conversations about infant feeding for people living with HIV (PLWH), including the option of breast/chestfeeding under conditions of viral suppression. While these changes represent meaningful progress, they unfold within a historical and contemporary landscape shaped by medical racism, gender-based oppression, criminalization, and persistent HIV stigma - forces that continue to constrain autonomy and trust in care. In this Perspective, we propose the Informed Free Choice model, a reproductive justice informed framework that moves beyond conventional shared decision-making to explicitly address structural inequities, power dynamics, and the lived realities of families affected by HIV. Drawing on interdisciplinary clinical practice, community advocacy, and participatory training and organizing with women living with HIV, we situate infant feeding decisions within multilevel systems of care and governance. We argue that Informed Free Choice requires not only accurate risk-benefit counseling, but also meaningful involvement of people living with HIV (MIPA), interdisciplinary care teams, trauma-informed and culturally responsive practices, and policy alignment that protects families from coercion, surveillance, and punishment. We conclude by outlining implications for clinical practice, guideline development, and future research, positioning Informed Free Choice as a necessary evolution in perinatal HIV care that aligns scientific advances with reproductive justice and health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.