ArticleFrontiers in language sciences2026
Co-Registration of EEG and Eye-Tracking in Psycholinguistics and Bilingualism Research.
Article in Frontiers in language sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eye-tracking and electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings provide a window into the human mind. Combining both methods through co-registration offers a powerful and innovative approach for examining how cognitive and neural processes unfold in real time. While both EEG and eye-tracking have independently advanced our understanding of bilingual language processing, co-registration research in the field of bilingualism remains scarce. Given the potential of co-registration methodology to integrate multiple sources of information, this article provides a theoretically and empirically informed perspective on how it can be applied to bilingualism research. Drawing on findings from EEG and eye-tracking studies on bilingual language processing, as well as co-registration research in reading, we identify key areas of bilingualism, such as crosslinguistic activation and inference revision, where co-registration can help address existing gaps. We also discuss several methodological challenges associated with co-registration and offer practical recommendations for its effective implementation in future studies. We conclude that co-registration can move research on bilingual language processing towards a more integrated perspective, one that better captures the dynamic interplay between language and cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.