ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026
Nuclear envelope proteins in cancer: revisiting the significance of LEM-domain proteins.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nuclear envelope dysfunction is increasingly recognized as a driver of cancer-associated alterations in chromatin organization, genome stability, and mechanotransduction. Among inner nuclear membrane components are the LEM-domain (LEM-D) proteins LAP2/TMPO, emerin (EMD), LEMD1, LEMD2, MAN1/LEMD3, ANKLE1, and ANKLE2. Accumulating evidence links dysregulation of these proteins to hallmark cancer processes, including cell-cycle control, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, genome instability, and therapeutic resistance. This review synthesizes recent mechanistic and translational findings on LEM-D proteins in cancer, highlighting isoform-specific functions, context-dependent oncogenic versus tumor-suppressive roles, and convergence on key pathways such as Wnt/β-catenin, PI3K/AKT, MAPK, and TGF-β signaling. Concrete evidence for prognostic value varies across the LEM-D proteins. While much of the current evidence derives from transcript-level and preclinical studies, emerging data suggest that LEM-D proteins contribute to nuclear stress adaptation and may represent context-dependent therapeutic vulnerabilities. We discuss their prognostic and predictive potential, critically evaluate limitations in current datasets, and present a unifying framework linking LEM-D dysfunction to genome instability, altered signalling, and therapy resistance. Thus, despite growing evidence of therapeutic potential, these proteins are better positioned as biomarkers to guide current therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.