ArticleCureus2026
Assessing Dental Anxiety in Naïve Patients: Development and Validation of the Naïve Dental Anxiety Scale (NDAS).
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The existing Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) is widely used to assess dental anxiety; however, it includes experience-based terminology that may not be appropriate for naïve (first-time) dental patients. This study aimed to validate a Naïve Dental Anxiety Scale (NDAS), adapted from the MDAS, and establish its comprehensive rationality. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among 200 dental patients visiting the outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital for the first time (termed naïve patients). The NDAS was developed as a five-item questionnaire based on anticipatory dental anxiety constructs. Content validity was assessed using an expert panel, followed by face validation and pilot testing for clarity and comprehensibility. Participants completed both the NDAS and the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS), along with demographic details. Psychometric evaluation included internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha, corrected item-total correlations, and criterion validity assessed through Spearman's correlation with MDAS. A two-tailed p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The NDAS demonstrated acceptable content validity (item-level CVI (I-CVI) ≥0.78 and scale-level CVI (S-CVI) ≥0.80). Internal consistency was good (Cronbach's α=0.82), with corrected item-total correlations ranging from 0.49 to 0.70, indicating meaningful contributions of all items. A statistically significant moderate positive correlation was observed between NDAS and MDAS scores (Spearman's ρ=0.49, p<0.001), supporting criterion validity. Conclusion The NDAS demonstrates good internal consistency and acceptable validity for assessing dental anxiety at the group level in naïve patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.