ReviewCureus2026
Post-dural Puncture Headache: Pathophysiology, Risk Stratification, Prevention, and Evidence-Based Management for Practicing Anesthesiologists.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a well-recognized secondary headache disorder resulting from persistent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage following iatrogenic dural disruption during neuraxial procedures, including spinal anesthesia, diagnostic lumbar puncture, dural puncture epidural (DPE), and unintentional dural puncture (UDP). The syndrome reflects a complex interaction between CSF hydrodynamics, craniospinal compliance, vascular compensation, and nociceptive sensitization. Reduction in CSF volume produces intracranial hypotension and compensatory venous dilation in accordance with the Monro-Kellie doctrine, while loss of CSF buoyancy permits caudal displacement of intracranial structures, resulting in traction on pain-sensitive meninges and cranial nerves and generating the characteristic orthostatic headache. Procedural variables, particularly needle gauge and tip geometry, represent the most important modifiable determinants of PDPH risk. Incidence varies from less than 3% following spinal anesthesia with small-gauge atraumatic needles to 50-85% after UDP with large-bore Tuohy needles, whereas DPE techniques demonstrate comparatively low incidence (approximately 0.5-2%). Management ranges from conservative therapy with hydration, analgesics, and caffeine to targeted pharmacologic therapies and epidural blood patch, which remains the gold-standard intervention with success rates approaching 70-90%. Emerging evidence implicating glymphatic dysfunction, neuroinflammatory mechanisms, and advanced imaging-based leak localization may facilitate improved risk stratification and individualized therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.