ArticleCureus2026
Feasibility of Outpatient Follow-Up After High-Dose Cytarabine Consolidation in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background High-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) consolidation is an essential component of post-remission therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and is usually delivered in inpatient settings due to anticipated cytopenias, infection risks, and transfusion needs. However, rising healthcare burdens have prompted interest in outpatient administration, but evidence remains limited, particularly in resource-constrained environments. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of outpatient follow-up after HiDAC consolidation compared with those of inpatient management. Methods This prospective observational study included 50 patients with AML aged 12-60 years who achieved complete remission following induction therapy and subsequently received high-dose cytarabine consolidation at Dhaka Medical College and Hospital from March 1, 2023, to February 29, 2024. Participants were allocated to outpatient (n=25) or inpatient (n=25) follow-up groups based on clinical assessment and physician discretion, including performance status, caregiver availability, and proximity to the hospital. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, hematologic parameters, adverse events, infection patterns, and healthcare utilization, particularly duration of hospitalization, were compared between the groups. Statistical analyses were performed using independent t-tests and chi-square tests, with statistical significance set at p≤0.05. Results Baseline characteristics were comparable across groups. All patients experienced expected cytopenias, with no significant differences in non-hematologic toxicities. Severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <0.5×10⁹/L) was less frequent in the outpatient group (7 (28%) vs. 17 (68%); p=0.005), and nadir ANC was significantly higher. Infection rates were low overall, with no infection-related mortality. Outpatient follow-up markedly reduced hospital stay duration (10.76 ± 0.78 vs. 17.2 ± 1.68 days, p<0.001) without increasing complications, readmissions, or documented infections. Patterns of culture-positive infections and hematologic recovery were comparable between settings. Conclusions Outpatient follow-up after HiDAC consolidation appears to be a feasible approach and may be safe in carefully selected AML patients based on performance status, caregiver support, and proximity to the hospital, with reduced hospitalization and no observed increase in short-term complications. With structured monitoring and standardized supportive care, outpatient management may help reduce healthcare burden. Larger multicenter studies with longer follow-up are required to validate long-term outcomes and refine patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.