ReviewSports health
Molecular Basis and Practical Applications of Training, Nutrition and Recovery for Maximum Gains in Lean Muscle Mass: A Narrative Review for Optimizing Muscular Hypertrophy.
Review in Sports health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextSkeletal muscle hypertrophy is a key determinant of strength, athletic performance, and functional capacity across the lifespan, and is clinically relevant to sarcopenia and chronic disease. This review integrates molecular mechanisms (e.g., mechanotransduction and mTORC1 signaling) with practical training, nutrition, and recovery variables to support evidence-informed hypertrophy programming. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Literature was searched in PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar (January 2010 to March 2024) using Boolean combinations of terms related to hypertrophy, resistance training variables and techniques, protein/macronutrients, sleep, and recovery. Included evidence prioritized randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and mechanistic studies relevant to training, nutrition, and recovery; case reports/editorials and endurance-only or unrelated populations/outcomes were excluded. STUDY
designClinical narrative review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.
resultsHypertrophy is maximized when resistance training provides sufficient mechanical tension and effective fiber recruitment, with weekly volume as a central driver. Practical synthesis supports ~10 to 20 sets per muscle group per week, near-failure efforts (repetitions in reserve ~0-2), and distributing volume across multiple weekly sessions to maintain training quality and recovery. Nutritional support centers on adequate protein intake (≈1.6 g/kg/day; often 1.6-2.2 g/kg/day in trained athletes), with meal distribution (≈3-4 meals/day, ~0.4-0.5 g/kg/meal) as a practical strategy to sustain anabolic signaling. Energy availability and carbohydrate intake support training performance and glycogen-dependent workload (≈3-6 g/kg/day), and a moderate caloric surplus (~200-500 kcal/day) may aid lean mass gain while limiting excess adiposity. Recovery, particularly sleep, modulates hormonal homeostasis and protein metabolism; adequate sleep duration (7-9 h/night) is emphasized as foundational for adaptation.
conclusionAn integrative approach to training, nutrition and rest offers the most actionable framework to maximize hypertrophy and strength while managing fatigue and individual recovery capacity.Strength-of-Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT):• Training and Nutritional (SOR A/B): most recommendations are based on Level 1 evidence.• Recovery and rest aspects (SOR B/C): Mechanistic evidence is high. More Level 1 evidence needed with hypertrophy-related outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.