ReviewInternational journal of oncology2026
Circulating proteins as biomarkers of response to cancer immunotherapy (Review).
Review in International journal of oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer management; however, durable benefit is observed only in a minority of patients. To overcome the limitations of currently approved tumour tissue‑based biomarkers of response, several approaches based on liquid biopsy are currently being developed. Among them, circulating proteins, such as soluble immune checkpoint regulators, cytokines, chemokines, growth factors and cellular modulators, are being increasingly assessed by multiplex technologies that use a low volume of biofluids and offer rapid results. Serum/plasma programmed death‑ligand 1, cytotoxic t‑lymphocyte‑associated protein 4, T‑cell immunoglobulin and mucin‑domain containing‑3, lymphocyte activation gene‑3, interleukin (IL)‑6 and IL‑8 have emerged as potentially useful indicators of early response or resistance to ICIs, particularly when quantified during treatment. However, the optimal timing of on‑treatment blood sampling remains to be determined. The current review aimed to present the most important findings on the association between circulating proteins and response to ICIs in solid tumours, and to discuss the position of this biomarker class in the current landscape of biomarkers for ICI therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.