ArticleJournal of palliative medicine2026
"We Talk About Everything": Experiences with Digital Health Communication in Palliative Care.
Article in Journal of palliative medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient and Caregiver Perspectives on Communication Quality in Tele-Palliative Care.Journal of palliative medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUse of digital communication tools (e.g., telehealth, patient portals) is increasing in outpatient palliative care (OPC).
objectiveAssess patient/caregiver experiences with digital communication tools.
designQualitative. SETTING/SUBJECTS: Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, English/Spanish/Cantonese-speaking, and ≥1 telehealth OPC visit in the prior year. If patients could not converse by phone, we interviewed their caregivers. MEASURES: We developed an interview guide using the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior framework. We analyzed semi-structured interviews using thematic analysis.
resultsAmong 32 participants, 10 were caregivers, 11 Spanish-speaking, 9 Cantonese-speaking. Theme 1: Video and in-person visits have important and distinct roles. Theme 2: Establishing a trusting rapport over video is possible. Theme 3: Engagement can be high with the patient portal despite poor usability.
conclusionsA flexible approach offering both video and in-person visits is ideal. Usability is a key factor in patient portal engagement. Our findings underscore the need to advocate for a permanent Medicare telehealth extension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.