ArticleAssessment2026
The Executive Function RPM Parent Rating Scale for Children: Purpose and Properties.
Article in Assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The interplay between executive function and learning disabilities: Developmental cognitive neuroscience perspectives on reading, math, and ADHD.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The goal of this study is to provide the psychometric properties of a new measure of executive function (EF), based on the representation, planning, monitoring/execution (RPM) process framework. Two versions of the EF RPM scale are contrasted with a different rating scale of EF, and further related to relevant associated outcomes. Results show positive distributional, reliability, and validity evidence for the EF RPM scale. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that items aligned with their assigned factor, and the factors were strongly related to one another as expected with a unitary EF process. The two versions of the EF RPM scale showed good convergent validity with another EF scale and expected relations with functional outcomes and demographic characteristics. The EF RPM scale also showed stronger discriminant validity relative to a different EF scale for non-EF behavioral symptomatology. Future work needs to gather additional evidence for these scales in different contexts and settings (e.g., in specific populations, in clinics) and in relation to other outcomes (e.g., achievement, daily life outcomes, cognitive variables).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.