ArticleEnvironmental analysis, health and toxicology2026
Environmental monitoring and smoking exposure before and after the designation of non-smoking areas in indoor sports facilities.
Article in Environmental analysis, health and toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the effectiveness of smoke-free legislation in reducing indoor air pollutants, specifically PM2.5, NO₂, and TVOC, in recreational facilities in Korea. A quasi-experimental before-and-after study was conducted in selected indoor venues, with pollutant levels compared pre- and post-designation of non-smoking areas. Monitoring was performed in three billiard halls and three screen golf ranges in Seoul. PM2.5, NO₂, and TVOC were measured using a Grimm 1.108 aerosol spectrometer (Germany), MEZUS-210/ANA-2 and Teledyne M200E (Korea/USA), and a Sibata MP-Σ30 sampler (Japan). Sampling occurred during operating hours, and results were analyzed using non-parametric tests against Korean standards. After implementation, PM2.5 decreased from 42.8 to 18.6 μg/m³, and NO₂ from 148.3 to 57.9 μg/m³, though reductions were not statistically significant. TVOC showed the clearest improvement, falling significantly from 29.2 to 18.4 ppb (p < 0.01). Smoke-free policies substantially reduced indoor pollutants, particularly TVOC, in recreational facilities. While PM2.5 and NO₂ declines were less consistent, the results highlight both the benefits of smoke-free laws and the need for complementary interventions such as improved ventilation and continuous monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.