ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026
Discontinuation of Oral Anticoagulation After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation - Are We Ready to Change Clinical Practice in 2026?
Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a complex cardiac arrhythmia that substantially compromises survival and quality of life. Patients with AF are predisposed to a substantially elevated risk of systemic embolism, including ischemic stroke. Clinical risk-stratification tools guide the initiation of oral anticoagulation (OAC) to mitigate these thromboembolic complications. However, chronic OAC is inherently associated with bleeding complications, some of which may be life-threatening. Historically, maintenance of OAC has remained the clinical standard even after successful catheter ablation and subsequent restoration of sinus rhythm. Given that the procedural efficacy of ablation has improved in recent years, the need for lifelong anticoagulation in patients without documented recurrences is increasingly questioned. Findings from recent randomized controlled trials - OCEAN and ALONE-AF - provide a new perspective on this clinical paradigm. Here, we integrated available data concerning this topic, with the goal of providing input into the ongoing debate. This review compares data from these landmark trials in the context of previous literature. Although current evidence supports discontinuation of OAC after successful catheter ablation, such data should be interpreted with caution due to the presence of high-risk cohorts and the persistent influence of the underlying atrial substrate. This review also analyzes clinical and imaging factors that identify high-risk patients who may be unsuitable for OAC discontinuation. We discuss the utility of left atrium functional assessment via speckle-tracking echocardiography. Furthermore, we examine strategies for high-fidelity rhythm surveillance and methods for managing subclinical recurrences. Finally, we summarize current evidence and propose directions for future research in personalized antithrombotic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.