ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2026
A comparative study on the outcomes of post-placental intrauterine contraceptive device insertion between preterm and term deliveries: a hospital-based observational study.
Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIndia is the most populous country in the world, with over 1.4 billion people, facing significant challenges in maternal and reproductive health services. Family planning is a key strategy to prevent unintended pregnancies and optimize spacing between births. Post-placental intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD) insertion is a safe, long-acting, reversible, and cost-effective method of immediate postpartum contraception. This study aimed to compare continuation rates, complications, and expulsion rates of PPIUCD insertion between preterm and term deliveries, and to explore factors influencing outcomes. SETTINGS AND
designHospital-based observational study conducted at VMMC & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi. MATERIALS AND
methodsAmong 2000 antenatal women counseled for immediate postpartum IUCD insertion, 240 (12%) consented and were enrolled. Participants were divided equally into preterm (n = 120) and term (n = 120) groups. CuT 380 A devices were inserted immediately post-placentally. Follow-up was conducted at 3, 6, and 12 months to assess continuation, satisfaction, expulsion, and complications. Counseling was provided antenatally and postnatally using standardized IEC materials, models, and checklists. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Categorical variables were presented as numbers and percentages. Chi-square tests and t-tests were applied where appropriate using SPSS 24.0, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
resultsThe mean age of participants was 26.9 ± 3.2 years. Continuation rates at 6 and 12 months were significantly higher in term deliveries (96.6% and 85.0%) than in preterm deliveries (88.3% and 63.3%; p < 0.05). Spontaneous IUCD expulsion was higher in preterm women at 6 months (7.5% vs. 1.6%) and 12 months (15.3% vs. 6.4%; p < 0.05), potentially due to smaller uterine size, underdeveloped uterine cavity, and variations in uterine involution. Satisfaction rates were high and comparable between groups at 12 months (81% preterm vs. 85% term; p > 0.05). Acceptance rates were low overall (12%), highlighting the need for structured counseling, provider training, and peer education to improve uptake.
conclusionPost-placental IUCD insertion is safe, effective, and cost-efficient in both preterm and term deliveries. Higher expulsion rates in preterm deliveries warrant focused counseling and follow-up. Structured antenatal and postnatal counseling, combined with provider confidence and patient education, is essential to increase acceptance and continuation of PPIUCD, particularly in populations at higher risk of early postpartum fertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.