ArticleReproductive health2026
Prevalence and type of contraception use among US college students: A needed update.
Article in Reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile rates of unintended pregnancy are declining among adolescents and young adults in the United States (US), rates remain higher than other industrialized nations and are associated with both educational and economic challenges. Studies examining young adult contraceptive practices are dated and limited in scope. Understanding current contraceptive use of young adults is critical to ensure intentional pregnancies.
methodsWe used the American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment III 2022-2023 national dataset to examine contraceptive use patterns among 30,568 sexually active 18- to 24-year-old college students at 4-year institutions. Differences based on students' biological sex, race/ethnicity, year in school and number of sexual partners in the last 12 months were examined. Prevalence estimates with confidence intervals were calculated; chi-square tests were used to assess initial bivariate differences and t-tests were used to determine significant pairwise comparisons. Bonferroni correction set the significance level to p<.001219.
resultsMost sexually active college students were using contraception (87.6%); however, there were significant differences among students based on demographic characteristics. Black, Latinx, and multiracial students and students with more than one sexual partner in the last 12 months were less likely to use contraception (ps < 0.001). There were also differences in the types of single and dual contraceptive methods used among students based on demographics. Significant differences based on race/ethnicity occurred across all methods and combinations of methods. Results indicated less consistent patterns of differences for sex, year in school, and number of sexual partners for single and dual use.
conclusionsThis study provides a critical update on contraceptive use among US college students. The findings indicate which subgroups may be more at risk for an unintended pregnancy due to lower overall contraceptive use and use of methods that are less effective. Differences in race/ethnicity regarding contraceptive use continue to exist, and students with fewer years of education emerged as another essential group deserving attention. Improved awareness of methods and access to birth control are potential strategies to increase uptake. College health professionals and other clinical providers who work with US college students can use these findings to inform discussions with students who may need additional information about all available options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.