ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2026
Well-being in intensive care: reflections from a multinational survey.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perceived inappropriateness of care among ICU clinicians is associated with burnout and intention to leave the job.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntensive care unit (ICU) professionals face high levels of stress, burnout, and work-related psychological strain. However, comprehensive multinational assessments of their well-being-particularly those exploring gender differences and work-life dynamics-are scarce.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted by the International Women in Intensive and Critical Care Network (iWIN) between October 2023 and June 2024. The 113-item questionnaire assessed well-being using the WHO-5 Well-Being Index and other validated instruments across eight domains. ICU professionals were recruited via email, professional meetings, and the iWIN website. Descriptive statistics, T-tests, chi-square, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for analysis.
resultsOne hundred fifty-eight ICU professionals from diverse roles responded (62% female, 37% male, 1% other). The median WHO-5 score was 68 (IQR 52-80); males reported significantly higher scores than females (72 vs. 60; p = 0.0051). Respondents reported high workload, moderate job autonomy, and frequent stress. Temporary employment was common, with 41.1% considering job transfers. Despite generally positive diversity ratings, gender disparities remained in perceptions of hiring, promotion, and career advancement fairness.
conclusionsThis exploratory survey found generally positive well-being among ICU professionals, with a gender difference observed in WHO-5 scores. Concerns related to workload, job insecurity, and career development were also reported. Findings should be interpreted with caution and warrant further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.