ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
A novel transparent visual channel translates into enhanced surgical safety and efficiency for prolapsed lumbar disc herniation: a comparative clinical study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe standard metal working channel in percutaneous translaminar endoscopic discectomy (PTED) creates a significant visual "blind spot," presenting a particular challenge during surgery for prolapsed lumbar disc herniation (PLDH). This obstruction can result in semi-blind surgical maneuvers, elevating the risk of neural injury and incomplete fragment removal. To overcome this fundamental limitation, we developed a novel transparent visual channel (TVC) and assessed its clinical performance.
methodsIn a retrospective comparative study, we analyzed 65 patients with PLDH who underwent PTED, utilizing either the novel TVC (n = 29) or the conventional metal working channel (n = 36). Key metrics for comparison included surgical field of view (quantified using the structural similarity index measure [SSIM]), total operation time, frequency of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring alerts, standard perioperative clinical indicators, complication rates, and patient-reported outcomes (Visual Analog Scale [VAS] for pain, Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], and MacNab criteria).
resultsThe TVC group demonstrated a significantly larger and more consistent surgical field of view, evidenced by a markedly higher SSIM (98.2% ± 1.1% vs. 54.6% ± 8.3%, P < 0.05). Operative efficiency was improved in the TVC group, with a significantly shorter mean operation time (83.2 ± 9.7 min vs. 97.5 ± 8.9 min, P < 0.05). Critically, the use of the TVC was associated with enhanced intraoperative safety, as indicated by a significant reduction in the number of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring alerts during neural decompression (2 vs. 11, P < 0.05). Both groups exhibited significant and comparable improvements in VAS scores, ODI scores, and MacNab outcomes at follow-up, with no statistically significant differences between the groups (P > 0.05).
conclusionThe novel transparent visual channel effectively converts the PTED procedure from a semi-blind technique to a fully visualized one. This material innovation delivers direct clinical advantages by improving intraoperative safety through reduced neural irritation and increasing procedural efficiency, all while maintaining the excellent clinical outcomes associated with standard PTED. This study substantiates the TVC as a significant advancement in endoscopic spine surgery instrumentation, directly addressing a core visual constraint of the established technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.