Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42098816›Full record

ArticlePorcine health management2026

Patterns and risk factors of pig transport mortality: implications for official controls in a high-throughput slaughterhouse.

Alfonso Rosamilia, Claudia Weiss, Francesca Iacoponi, Chiara Casadio, Chiara Guarnieri, Stefano Benedetti, Giuseppe Marruchella, Giuseppe Merialdi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Porcine health management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alfonso RosamiliaIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia- Romagna, Via Antonio Bianchi 9, 25124, Brescia, Italy. alfonso.rosamilia@izsler.it.
Claudia WeissRegione Emilia-Romagna, Settore Prevenzione Collettiva and Sanità Pubblica, Viale Aldo Moro 21, 40127, Bologna, Italy.
Francesca IacoponiDepartment of Food Safety, Nutrition and Veterinary Public Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Chiara CasadioRegione Emilia-Romagna, Settore Prevenzione Collettiva and Sanità Pubblica, Viale Aldo Moro 21, 40127, Bologna, Italy.
Chiara GuarnieriLocal Health Unit Authority, Via San Giovanni del Cantone 23, 41121, Modena, Italy.
Stefano BenedettiRegione Emilia-Romagna, Settore Prevenzione Collettiva and Sanità Pubblica, Viale Aldo Moro 21, 40127, Bologna, Italy.
Giuseppe MarruchellaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Località Piano d'Accio, 64100, Teramo, Italy.
Giuseppe MerialdiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia- Romagna, Via Antonio Bianchi 9, 25124, Brescia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransport to slaughterhouses is a critical phase in pig production, affecting welfare and economics. Mortality during transport, or dead-on-arrival (DOA), is a direct indicator of welfare compromise. This study evaluated the association between estimated transport distance, ambient temperature, and consignment size with mortality in commercial pig journeys lasting ≤ 8 h.

resultsData from 34,239 consignments from 434 farms transported to a high-throughput slaughterhouse were analyzed. Consignment size ranged from 5 to 164 pigs, estimated transport distances from 5 to 605 km, and ambient loading temperatures ranged from 0.9 °C to 31.2 °C. Overall average mortality rate was 0.062%, with 93.1% of consignments showing no DOA pigs. Seasonal patterns were pronounced, with summer exhibiting the highest mortality and winter/spring the lowest. Mixed-effects logistic regression showed that ambient temperature and estimated transport distance were positively associated with mortality (OR = 1.354 and 1.086, respectively), while larger consignments exhibited a negative association (OR = 0.910). Each 1 °C increase in temperature corresponded to a 3.86% rise in the odds of pigs being DOA. Random farm effects showed substantial between-farm variability. Average transport mortality per farm categorized 36.9% of farms as being at very low risk, 13.1% as low, 24.9% as medium, and 25.1% as high risk. Best Linear Unbiased Predictors (BLUP) estimates identified 38 farms with significantly higher-than-average mortality, while funnel plot analysis highlighted 26 outliers, providing complementary approaches to benchmark farm performance and prioritize high-risk holdings for welfare monitoring. Among 664 (1.95%) consignments inspected by official veterinarians, mortality was 0.036%, and inspections were evenly distributed across seasons, ambient temperatures, and consignment characteristics. Only 86 (12.95%) of inspections targeted the 26 high-risk farms identified by the funnel plot. These results suggest that inspection efforts were not preferentially directed toward farms with elevated predicted mortality.

conclusionsPig mortality during journeys lasting ≤ 8 h transports is mainly associated with ambient temperature and, to a lesser extent, estimated transport distance, with summer as a high-risk period. Larger consignments modestly reduce risk, and mortality per farm highlight the potential for targeted interventions. Current veterinary inspections are not systematically aligned with risk, suggesting scope to optimize monitoring and welfare outcomes.

Indexed as

Ambient temperatureJourneys lasting ≤ 8 hoursOfficial controlPig welfareSeasonTransport mortality

Identifiers

PMID42098816
PMCPMC13321726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.