Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42098783›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2026

Current status and influencing factors of digital literacy among clinical pediatric nurses: a cross-sectional study.

Xianghui Yu, Shaoxue Zhan, Cheng Yang, Yanbo Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xianghui Yu *Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 72 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Shaoxue Zhan *Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 72 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Cheng Yang *Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 72 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Yanbo WangDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 72 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China. wangyanbo19870827@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the in-depth advancement of digital medical transformation, the digital literacy of clinical pediatric nurses has become a key factor affecting the quality and efficiency of pediatric nursing services. Given the unique vulnerabilities of pediatric patients-including limited expressive ability, rapid clinical deterioration, and the need for family-integrated care-understanding and enhancing digital literacy in this specialty is particularly critical. This study aims to investigate the current status of digital literacy among clinical pediatric nurses and identify its influencing factors.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted at a tertiary Grade A children's hospital in China using convenience sampling. Of 300 questionnaires distributed, 284 were included in the final analysis (response rate: 94.67%). The self-designed "Digital Literacy Scale for Clinical Pediatric Nurses" (with good reliability and validity, including exploratory factor analysis confirming a four-factor structure) was used for data collection.

resultsA total of 284 clinical pediatric nurses were included. The total digital literacy score was 68.95 ± 9.02 points, with an overall moderate level. Age, educational level, professional title and work experience were moderately positively correlated with digital literacy scores (r = 0.426 ~ 0.478, all P < 0.001), and recent digital technology training was weakly positively correlated (r = 0.395, P < 0.001). Given observed collinearity between professional title and work experience (r = 0.782), a composite "Career Seniority" variable was constructed for the regression model. Multiple linear regression analysis identified four independent positive predictors of digital literacy: age (β' = 0.159, P < 0.001), educational level (β' = 0.281, P < 0.001), Career Seniority (β' = 0.215, P < 0.001), and recent digital technology training (β' = 0.370, P < 0.001). The final regression model explained 37.0% of the variance in digital literacy scores (adjusted R² = 0.370, F = 34.892, P < 0.001), with recent digital technology training emerging as the strongest predictor.

conclusionThe overall level of digital literacy among clinical pediatric nurses is moderate. These findings highlight the importance of both experiential factors (age, career seniority) and modifiable factors (educational level, recent training) in shaping digital literacy. The strong predictive role of recent training suggests that training may be an important modifiable correlate of digital literacy, warranting evaluation in future interventional studies. Healthcare institutions should consider developing structured, scenario-based training programs and personalized learning pathways to support the continuous development of digital literacy in pediatric nursing practice.

Indexed as

Clinical nursesCross-sectional studyDigital literacyInfluencing factorsPediatric nursingTraining

Identifiers

PMID42098783
PMCPMC13321534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.