Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42098728›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2026

Navigating structural demands and relational care: a qualitative study of public health nurses' experiences and handling of online screening tools.

Trine Holm, Elin Thygesen, Geir Inge Hausvik, Thomas Westergren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Trine HolmDepartment of Health and Nursing Science, University of Agder, Jon Lillistons vei 9, Grimstad, 4879, Norway. Trine.Holm@uia.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4229-9927
Elin ThygesenDepartment of Health and Nursing Science and academic leader of the Center for e-Health at the University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3242-8864
Geir Inge HausvikDepartment of Information Systems, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5285-8621
Thomas WestergrenDepartment of Public Health at the University of Stavanger, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4253-1996

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnline screening tools are recommended in well-child visits to support early detection and standardized assessment, while also facilitating meaningful dialogue and collaboration with parents. However, little is known about how public health nurses experience and handle these tools in practice. The aim of this study was to explore public health nurses' experiences with, and handling of, online screening tools in their work practices in well-child clinics and school health services.

methodWe used observations and semi-structured interviews to capture public health nurses' experiences and practices after integration of online screening tools. Public health nurses were observed during well-child visits, and when possible, also before and after visits to provide a broader understanding of their practice. In total, eight public health nurses were observed in connection to well-child visits with families of children aged 0-7 years. Interviews were conducted over an extended time-period, with a total of 13 public health nurses participating individually or in groups. Data was analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis of verbatim transcripts and field notes.

findingsThe findings from this study illustrate how public health nurses experienced tension between structural requirements and relational values when online screening tools were implemented into their practice. The relationship with families was considered the cornerstone of their work, shaping trust, continuity, and holistic understanding. While the tools offered opportunities for structured assessment and dialogue, they also introduced uncertainty about interpretation, follow-up, and professional responsibility, often diverting time and attention away from nurturing relationships. The experienced tension between standardized procedures and relational care reflected a deeper struggle to balance professional obligations with the relational connection that public health nurses regarded as foundational to their role. These dynamics are explored through three themes: When the Structures Comes Between Us, When We Get Trapped Within the Structures, and When the Structures Supports Our Practice.

conclusionTo realize the potential benefits of online screening tools, integration must safeguard both structural requirements and relational needs, ensuring that structures do not come at the expense of trust, relationship, and presence.

trial registrationNot applicable.

Indexed as

Online screening toolsPrimary health carePublic health nursingWell child care

Identifiers

PMID42098728
PMCPMC13321622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.