Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42098689›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026

Research on depression diagnosis method based on multi-scale analysis of frontal lead EEG.

Huigang Wang, Weilin Kuang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Huigang WangMedical and Healthcare Center of Shandong Sports University, Rizhao, Shandong, 276800, PR China.
Weilin KuangJi'an Vocational and Technical College, Ji'an, Jiangxi, 343000, PR China. 13361655761@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression is one of the most prevalent mental disorders globally, severely affecting individuals' emotional, cognitive, and physical functions while imposing profound socioeconomic impacts. Traditional diagnostic approaches primarily rely on clinical judgment and self-assessment scales; however, these methods carry inherent risks of misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis, necessitating more precise and efficient diagnostic tools.

aimsThis study employs a two-channel frontal EEG system for depression detection, aiming to simplify data acquisition processes and reduce costs while ensuring high classification accuracy.

methodElectroencephalography (EEG), as a non-invasive biosignal monitoring technique, enables real-time recording of brain electrical activity. By extracting multiple features including relative power, fuzzy entropy, and mutual information, combined with multi-scale analysis techniques, the detection accuracy for depression was further enhanced.

resultsThe study compared three traditional machine learning models with three deep learning models, among which the Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) model demonstrated superior performance, achieving a classification accuracy of 91.02% and exhibiting strong robustness.

conclusionsThe aforementioned approach provides preliminary technical support for the application of EEG signals in depression detection, and represents a proof-of-concept for multi-scale feature-enhanced automated depression screening. Further validation in larger, clinically representative, and externally verified cohorts is necessary before practical deployment can be considered.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDepressionElectroencephalographyMachine LearningSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAdultFemaleHumansDeep learningDepression detectionFrontal EEG signalsMachine learningMulti-scale signal reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID42098689
PMCPMC13188617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.