ArticleBMC oral health2026
Effect of occlusal splint design and thickness on temporomandibular joint loading: a finite element study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesOcclusal splints are a mainstay in the management of temporomandibular disorders, but the mechanical influence of design and thickness variations on joint and dental structures remains unclear. This study compared the stress and strain distributions within the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and adjacent tissues produced by Michigan (stabilization) and non-permissive splints of 3-mm and 5-mm thicknesses using finite element analysis. MATERIALS AND
methodsThree-dimensional models of the maxilla, mandible, teeth, periodontal ligament, and articular disc were reconstructed from the Visible Human Project dataset. Michigan and non-permissive splints were modeled with occlusal thicknesses of 3 mm and 5 mm. Functional muscle forces were applied to simulate mandibular movements, and linear static analyses were performed in OptiStruct under defined boundary conditions.
resultsThe splint-free model showed the highest stress levels in all structures. Non-permissive splints significantly reduced mandibular stress (32.3 MPa) but increased loading on the periodontal ligament. Michigan splints resulted in lower periodontal ligament stresses and a more even stress distribution within the articular disc. Increasing splint thickness improved stress reduction only in the non-permissive model.
conclusionsOcclusal splints lowered peak stresses in the TMJ and related structures. Non-permissive splints provided greater joint protection, while Michigan splints achieved a more balanced distribution of occlusal forces. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Splint design and thickness affect how loads are transferred through the temporomandibular system. Non-permissive splints, particularly at 5 mm, reduced joint stress but increased periodontal ligament loading. Splint selection should consider the main treatment goal, with attention to using the minimal effective thickness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.