Observational studyBMC public health2026
Social learning theory application and potential in health education conducted by healthcare workers on TikTok - a content analysis observational study.
Observational study in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSocial media is increasing its role as a key source of health information and a platform for sharing health-related content. Among different platforms, TikTok has emerged as a popular medium used for promoting a healthy lifestyle, particularly among younger demographics. The potential basis for health education activities may involve the Social Learning Theory, which emphasises the role of behaviour modelling and social reinforcement in learning. This study aims to identify elements attributable to Social Learning Theory in health education content posted by healthcare practitioners on TikTok and to consider how the theory might explain how their activities on the platform could effectively influence lifestyle change through social media.
methodsThe study used content analysis, a method for systematically examining patterns, themes, and meanings embedded in user-generated communications, including textual, visual, and audiovisual materials. An analysis was performed on 30 purposively sampled profiles of healthcare professionals who conduct educational activities on TikTok. The goal was to identify elements related to the assumptions of Social Learning Theory. The selection of TikTok accounts was carried out using a purposive sampling method, searching for keywords that corresponded to medical professions. This approach aimed to ensure representativeness and diversity among the medical professions in the sample, as well as to select accounts that varied in terms of follower counts and engagement rates.
resultsThe authors of the analysed profiles employed various strategies to conduct educational activities, striving to create a unique style. The analysis revealed the presence of Social Learning Theory mechanisms, including attracting attention, supporting content memorization, enhancing motivation to adopt health‑related behaviours, and reinforcing reproduction and self‑efficacy. These mechanisms were identifiable across the examined profiles and reflected in diverse ways in creators' communication strategies.
conclusionsWhile Social Learning Theory emphasises the importance of observation and internal processes-such as attention, retention, and reproduction-in the acquisition of behaviour, it is also essential to consider the external context in which creators operate. Many of the observed strategies align with those recommended in social media marketing, including capturing attention, storytelling, and building emotional engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.