Observational studyBMC emergency medicine2026
Predictors of in-hospital mortality: after a methanol poisoning outbreak in Istanbul.
Observational study in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Methanol-related deaths: evaluation of findings in a 111-case autopsy series.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMethanol poisoning remains a major public health problem, particularly during outbreaks related to illicit alcohol consumption, and is associated with high mortality. Early identification of patients at high risk of death is critical to guide timely triage and aggressive management in the emergency department (ED).
objectivesTo identify clinical and laboratory predictors of in-hospital mortality among patients with methanol poisoning during an outbreak and to evaluate the prognostic performance of key parameters using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and logistic regression.
methodsThis retrospective observational cohort study was conducted in the ED of a tertiary-care hospital in Istanbul, Türkiye, during a methanol poisoning outbreak between December 1, 2024, and January 31, 2025. Adult patients (≥ 18 years) diagnosed with methanol poisoning were included. Demographic data, clinical findings, laboratory results, arterial blood gas parameters, and treatments were collected. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. ROC curve analyses and univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were performed.
resultsA total of 55 patients were included (92.7% male; median age 46.0 years [IQR 38.5-55.0]). In-hospital mortality occurred in 25 patients (45.5%). Non-survivors had significantly lower arterial pH, bicarbonate, and base excess values and higher lactate levels and anion gap compared with survivors (all p < 0.001). Arterial pH demonstrated excellent prognostic performance (AUC 0.969), with an optimal cut-off value of ≤ 6.89 (92.0% sensitivity, 96.7% specificity). In multivariable analysis, arterial pH remained an independent predictor of mortality, with each 0.1-unit decrease associated with a 2.78-fold increase in the odds of death. In a model excluding arterial blood gas parameters, higher lactate levels and lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores were independently associated with mortality.
conclusionsDuring methanol poisoning outbreaks, arterial pH is the strongest predictor of in-hospital mortality. Serum lactate and neurological status provide additional prognostic value when arterial blood gas analysis is unavailable. These findings support the use of arterial pH as a decision-support tool for early escalation of care, including emergent hemodialysis and intensive care admission, and suggest that serum lactate and GCS may serve as actionable triage parameters in resource-limited or high-burden surge settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.