Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42098655›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2026

Hybrid model based on fuzzy logic and classification trees for the prediction of mortality of critical trauma patients: Pre-hospital variables from the RETRAUCI registry.

Luis Serviá, Mariona Badia, Neus Montserrat, Judit Vilanova, Gabriel Jiménez, Juan Antonio Llompart-Pou, Jesús Abelardo Barea-Mendoza, Mario Chico-Fernández, Javier Trujillano, Neurointensive Care and Trauma Working Group of the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine (SEMICYUC)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luis ServiáIntensive Care Department, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova. IRBLLEIDA, Avda Rovira Roure 80, Lleida, 25198, Spain.
Mariona BadiaIntensive Care Department, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova. IRBLLEIDA, Avda Rovira Roure 80, Lleida, 25198, Spain.
Neus MontserratIntensive Care Department, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova. IRBLLEIDA, Avda Rovira Roure 80, Lleida, 25198, Spain.
Judit VilanovaIntensive Care Department, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova. IRBLLEIDA, Avda Rovira Roure 80, Lleida, 25198, Spain.
Gabriel JiménezIntensive Care Department, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova. IRBLLEIDA, Avda Rovira Roure 80, Lleida, 25198, Spain.
Juan Antonio Llompart-PouIntensive Care Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Institut d'Investigació Sanitària Illes Balears (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Jesús Abelardo Barea-MendozaIntensive Care Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Mario Chico-FernándezIntensive Care Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Javier TrujillanoIntensive Care Department, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova. IRBLLEIDA, Avda Rovira Roure 80, Lleida, 25198, Spain. javier.trujillano@udl.cat.
Neurointensive Care and Trauma Working Group of the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine (SEMICYUC)

Funding

Fundación Mutua Madrileña AP117892013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn critically injured trauma patients, tools that stratify injury severity and estimate mortality are essential. Fuzzy logic (FL) enables the creation of accurate, interpretable models but requires decision rules, which can be generated using machine learning (ML) techniques like classification trees (CT). Our objective was to develop a hybrid model combining fuzzy logic and classification trees to estimate ICU mortality risk using only prehospital variables.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study using data from the Spanish Trauma ICU registry (RETRAUCI) from 2015 to 2022. Patients were randomly divided into derivation (DS) and validation sets (VS) (70:30). Candidate variables were those available in the prehospital phase. A hybrid model (HFL) was developed using a Fuzzy Inference System built with the 'FuzzyR' library in RStudio (v 2024.04.2) and the Mamdani method. CHAID (Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection) classification trees were used to derive the rules. The HFL's discrimination and calibration were compared with other scores: Revised Trauma Score (RTS); Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, and Arterial Pressure (GAP); Mechanism, Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, and Arterial Pressure (MGAP); Reverse shock index multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale score (rSIG); and Trauma Rating Index in Age, Glasgow Coma Scale, Respiratory Rate, and Systolic Blood Pressure (TRIAGE).

resultsThe study included 11,030 records, with 7,728 in the DS and 3,302 in the VS, and an overall mortality of 11.1%. Five variables were selected, ordered by importance: GCS, age, systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, and heart rate. A total of 32 classification rules were generated. The HFL model achieved the highest accuracy in DS and VS, with AUROC of 0.87 (0.86-0.88) and 0.86 (0.83-0.88), and acceptable calibration with intercepts of -0.11 (-0.18 to -0.04) and - 0.19 (-0.32 to -0.06) and slopes of 0.99 (0.94-1.05) and 0.96 (0.83-0.88).

conclusionsOur hybrid model achieves accuracy comparable to commonly used models and provides clear clinical interpretation, with GCS and age as key variables.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessFuzzy LogicWounds and InjuriesAdultClassification AlgorithmsDecision TreesFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleHospital MortalityHumansInjury Severity ScoreIntensive Care UnitsMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsClassification treesFuzzy logicIntensive care unitMortalityPrognostic scoring systemsTrauma and injury severity score

Identifiers

PMID42098655
PMCPMC13173980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.