Observational studyBMC emergency medicine2026
Reducing emergency department crowding through a transition ward: a pre-post observational study.
Observational study in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmergency department (ED) crowding is a persistent global issue, particularly in tertiary and university hospitals, where delayed admissions impair patient flow. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of implementing a transition ward (TW), established in May 2022 as a temporary inpatient care area to accommodate eligible admitted ED patients awaiting hospital beds, on ED crowding, focusing on reductions in boarding patient numbers and overall patient volume in ED.
methodsThis prospective, observational, single-center study was conducted at the Adult ED of a tertiary hospital between April 23 and June 2, 2023. ED crowding data were collected six times per day, yielding a total of 216 data points. As a baseline reference, data from the identical period in 2021, before the implementation of the TW, were used for comparison. The primary outcomes were the number of boarding patients and the total number of ED patients. Secondary outcomes included the longest waiting time for admitted patients, and the longest waiting time for examination.
resultsFollowing the implementation of TW, the median total number of ED patients decreased by 22.0% (from 41.0 to 32.0; median difference -9.0, 95% CI: -10.4 to -7.7), and the median number of boarding patients decreased by 25.0% (from 23.5 to 18.0; median difference -5.5, 95% CI: -6.7 to -4.3). The median longest examination waiting time decreased by 40.2% (from 66.0 minutes to 39.5 minutes; median difference -26.5, 95% CI: -36.9 to -16.1).
conclusionsThe TW was associated with significant reductions in total ED patient volume and boarding patient volume, particularly in a high-volume tertiary care setting. These findings suggest that TWs can contribute to measurable improvements in ED patient flow and reductions in access block. Based on these positive outcomes, similar units may be extended to other inpatient specialties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.