ReviewBMC infectious diseases2026
Review on pertussis case definitions: a need for reliable disease surveillance.
Review in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExisting clinical case definitions of pertussis are decades old and mainly rely on clinical signs and symptoms in infants and children. In the recent past, an age shift of pertussis towards adolescents and adults has been noted and disease presentation often is different from that in children. Therefore, in 2011 the Global Pertussis Initiative (GPI) proposed an age-stratified case definition, but its uptake has been slow. This prompted members of the GPI steering committee to critically review the case definition. In preparation for this, we performed a review to learn which case definitions have been used worldwide.
methodsWe performed a narrative literature review to collect publications from January 1, 1975, to September 1, 2025, which include pertussis case definitions. This was complimented by a survey amongst GPI members to gather case definitions currently in use for pertussis surveillance in their countries.
resultsThe literature review identified 117 relevant publications. The two most often used case definitions were those proposed by CDC and WHO, followed by individual case definitions developed by the respective investigators for the purpose of their studies. Additionally, GPI members provided 16 country-specific surveillance case definitions. Cough and typical pertussis signs paroxysms, whooping and post-tussive vomiting are most commonly used clinical criteria. With regards to laboratory confirmation of B. pertussis infection, all case definitions require at least one criterion, most often a positive culture and/or PCR, followed by specific serology. Most case definitions do not use age-specific criteria. DISCUSSION: Many different case definitions are in use all over the world. Most of them are focusing on the typical presentation of pertussis, i.e. disregarding less typical disease presentations and do not use age-specific criteria. This hampers a reliable and comparable disease surveillance. Therefore, a harmonized case definition that could be used globally would be highly welcome. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.