ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2026
Early prediction of in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with heart failure using an interpretable machine learning model: a retrospective study based on MIMIC-IV.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and external validation of an explainable machine learning model for in-hospital mortality risk stratification in intensive care unit patients with heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeart failure (HF) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and acute decompensation frequently necessitates intensive care. Early identification of high-risk patients is essential, yet traditional HF risk scores were developed largely in chronic or ward-based cohorts and often fail to capture early physiologic deterioration in the ICU. Explainable machine-learning (ML) models may improve early risk stratification.
methodsUsing the MIMIC-IV v3.1 database, we conducted a retrospective study of adult ICU patients with heart failure identified by ICD-10 codes (I50.x) between October 1, 2015 and 2022. Predictors included demographics, comorbidities, pre-ICU cardiovascular medications, and vital signs and laboratory tests obtained within 0-6 h of ICU admission. Implausible values were removed; missing data were imputed using medians or modes. An XGBoost classifier was trained with an 80/20 stratified split and class weighting. Performance in the test cohort was assessed using AUC, average precision, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and Brier score. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used for global and feature-level interpretability.
resultsA total of 12,110 ICU patients with HF were included, of whom 2,041 (16.9%) died in hospital. In the test cohort (n = 2,422), the model achieved an AUC of 0.797 (95% CI, 0.772-0.822) and an average precision of 0.491. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.632 and 0.793 at the default threshold; using the Youden-optimal threshold increased sensitivity to 0.708. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significant separation of survival curves across predicted risk quartiles (log-rank P < 0.001), supporting the survival stratification of early risk predictions. SHAP analysis identified FiO₂, age, lactate, Charlson comorbidity index, BUN, and systolic blood pressure as the strongest predictors, revealing clinically coherent non-linear relationships and interactions.
conclusionThese findings suggest that an interpretable model based on routinely available early ICU data may facilitate structured and quantitative risk stratification within the first hours of admission, thereby assisting clinicians in identifying high-risk patients who may benefit from closer monitoring and timely escalation of supportive care, rather than replacing clinical judgment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.