Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42098561›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2026

Active dependency formation and ambiguity resolution in real-time sentence processing.

Hiroki Fujita, Masaya Yoshida

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hiroki FujitaDepartment of Linguistics, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany. hiroki.fujita@uni-potsdam.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7649-9707
Masaya YoshidaDepartament de Filologia Catalana, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 500540359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In late-closure garden-path sentences such as "Whenever the boys hug Tom smiles happily", the locally ambiguous noun phrase ("Tom") is initially analysed as the direct object of the embedded verb ("hug") and is later revised as the subject of the matrix clause once the disambiguating verb ("smiles") is encountered. The present study investigated whether active dependency formation affects the resolution of this ambiguity in three self-paced reading experiments. The experimental sentences contained wh-trace and/or PRO-controller dependencies, which were designed to introduce biases towards the subject analysis. The results showed that, although active dependency formation did not prevent the object analysis, it did reduce the revision cost at the disambiguating verb. This reduction was more pronounced when multiple unresolved dependencies were present than when only a single unresolved dependency was present. We discuss the implications of these findings for our understanding of how dependencies are established and how ambiguities are resolved during real-time sentence processing.

Indexed as

Active dependency formationAmbiguity resolutionLanguage comprehensionSentence parsingSentence processing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.