ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Machine learning and neural network algorithms for prediction of C5 palsy after posterior surgery for ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeC5 palsy (C5P) is one of the main postoperative complications of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). However, an accurate predictive tool for C5P remains to be developed. Forecasting this potentially avoidable consequence preoperatively can improve patient management, shared decision-making, and counseling.
methodsElectronic medical records and radiographic measurements of patients with OPLL who underwent posterior cervical spine surgery between January 1, 2012 and May 1, 2022 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The data were split into training (80%) and testing (20%) datasets. Two machine learning algorithms and a logistic regression model were trained and optimized using the training dataset, and their performances were assessed using the testing dataset. Important feature screening was conducted to identify the influential factors associated with the dependent variable, and model-based threshold effect analysis was further performed to derive data-driven cutoff values for continuous predictors, and category-specific effects were summarized for discrete variables. Additionally, three advanced neural network models were also preliminarily applied and explored in this study.
resultsIn terms of predicting the postoperative C5P condition, the model with the best performance was the random forest model, with an AUC value of 0.9273, an accuracy rate of 0.8983, a precision rate of 0.8, a recall rate of 0.6667, and an F1 score of 0.7273. The results of the feature importance of the logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoost models indicated that the spinal canal occupancy rate (SCOR) was the most important predictive factor for postoperative C5P. The variable threshold effect analysis of the random forest model showed that when the SCOR was greater than 46%, there would be a significant risk of C5P.
conclusionMachine learning models showed good predictive power and provided information about the phenotypes of patients with OPLL most likely to develop C5P after surgical intervention. In general, the utilization of machine learning holds promises as a valuable tool for the management of patients with OPLL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42098495What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.